Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Significance Inbreeding depression (ID) is the reduction of fitness in offspring of related parents. This phenomenon can be quantified from SNP data through a number of measures of inbreeding. Our study addresses two key questions. How accurate are the different methods to estimate ID? And how and why should investigators choose among the multiple inbreeding measures to detect and quantify ID? Here, we compare the behaviors of ID estimates from three commonly used SNP-based measures of inbreeding and provide both theoretical and empirical arguments to answer these questions. Our work illustrates how to analyze SNP data efficiently to detect and quantify ID, across species and traits.

Original publication

DOI

10.1073/pnas.1621096114

Type

Journal article

Journal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Publication Date

08/08/2017

Volume

114

Pages

8602 - 8607